Reporting of channel state information

ABSTRACT

A mobile station is connected to a multi-carrier cellular communication system having a plurality of sub-carriers. The sub-carriers are classified into K frequency sub-bands, channel state information (CSI) of the frequency sub-bands is represented by matrices W i  ( i=0 . . . K−1), where K is an integer grater than 1. The mobile station determines a first sub-index k 1  for the K matrices W i (i=0 . . . K−1), and a second sub-index k 2  for each one of the K matrices W i (i=0 . . . K−1). The first sub-index k 1  is common for all frequency sub-bands, and the second sub-index k 2  is specific for the indexed matrix that corresponds to one frequency sub-band. The mobile station reports to a base station of the multi-carrier cellular communication system the first sub-index k 1  and at least one second sub-index k 2 .

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/856,460, filed on Dec. 28, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/621,350, filed on Feb. 12, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,876,550. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/621,350 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/784,312, filed on Mar. 4, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,983,001, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/544,878, filed on Jul. 9, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,837,607. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/544,878 is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/CN2010/079938, filed on Dec. 17, 2010. The International Application No. PCT/CN2010/079938 claims priorities to International Application No. PCT/SE2010/000002 filed on Jan. 8, 2010, and Swedish Patent Application No. SE1000015-6, filed on Jan. 8, 2010. All of the aforementioned patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a method and apparatus of reporting channel state information in wireless communication. In particular embodiments, it relates to a method and apparatus of such information reporting of channel state(s) having a codebook representative.

BACKGROUND

It is well known in the art that the performance is greatly enhanced if linear precoding can be used at a transmitter side in wireless communication systems supporting multiple antenna transmissions. Such linear precoding has been implemented, e.g., in the IEEE 802.16-2005 standard and in the 3GPP Rel. 8 Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard.

To support precoding at the transmitter side, the receiver, sometimes also known as a User Equipment (UE) in the Downlink (DL), needs to feed back Channel State Information (CSI) about the multi-antenna channel between transmit and receive antennas. The CSI may consist of a representation of the actual multi-antenna channel, or alternatively a preferred precoding vector/matrix which the UE has determined based on measurements on the multi-antenna channel. In the latter case, the CSI is commonly referred to as a Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI).

To reduce feedback overhead when signalling CSI reports, quantization is required so as to represent the CSI in a finite number of bits. As an example, the 3GPP LTE Rel. 8 standard use a precoding matrix codebook consisting of 64 matrices and the UE feeds back the preferred precoding matrix using six information bits.

As mentioned above, a codebook of a finite number of matrices is commonly used to quantize the CSI in which case the CSI feedback is an index to a codebook that points out the matrix in the codebook that best represents the CSI. The index is then reported to the transmit node using for instance a string of binary bits.

As the channel is frequency and time selective by nature, a CSI report is only valid with reasonable accuracy up to some maximum bandwidth and for some maximum time. If the communication system wants to support transmission bandwidths using linear precoding for larger than this maximum bandwidth, feedback of multiple CSI reports is needed and further these CSI reports need to be repeated in time with appropriate intervals.

The bandwidth and time interval of each of these CSI reports are denoted as time-frequency granularity of the CSI, and if a codebook of matrices is used to quantize the CSI, one matrix is reported per time interval and frequency bandwidth.

To meet the high requirements on data throughput in future wireless communication systems, such as the 3GPP LTE-Advanced, an even larger number of transmitter and receiver antennas are envisioned. Since the dimensions of the multi-antenna channel thereby increases, the required CSI feedback overhead will increase further, thereby hampering the desired throughput increase.

Furthermore, when the number of antennas (or antenna elements) is increased, the physical dimensions of the transmitter and receivers will also increase, which is undesirable due to the larger area of, e.g., a Base Station (BS) which will make it more vulnerable to environmental effects such as strong winds. Also, the architectural (visible) impact on buildings and the effect on landscape or cityscape should not be neglected in this context. To partly cope with the problem of larger antenna arrays dual polarized antenna elements is commonly assumed, since by utilizing two orthogonal polarizations of the electromagnetic field, one can effectively have two antennas in one. So, by utilizing polarized antennas, the total dimension of the antenna arrays is roughly halved.

Another obvious approach to make equipment with many antenna elements physically smaller is to reduce the spacing between the antenna elements. This will make signals received and transmitted more correlated (if they have the same polarization) and it is well known that the expected multiple antenna spatial multiplexing gain will be reduced. However, it is also known that correlated signals make very good and narrow beams, and the multiple antenna spatial multiplexing could then be used to transmit to users which are spatially separated. This is sometimes called Spatial Division Multiple Access (SDMA) or Multi-User MIMO (MU-MIMO). Hence, the drawback of lower per user throughput when using narrow spaced antennas elements can be compensated by transmitting to multiple users simultaneously, which will increase the total cell throughput (i.e., the sum of all users throughput in the cell).

Further, it is a known physical property that the channel emanating from antennas with orthogonal polarizations have close to independent fading. It is further known that channels emanating from closely spaced equally polarized antenna elements have correlated fading. Hence, for multi-antenna transmitters and receivers having a large number of antenna elements, compact antenna arrays which also utilize the polarization dimension is preferred. In this case, it is observed that among the antenna elements, the correlation between the radio channels between some pairs of the antenna elements is high, whereas the correlation for the radio channels between some other pairs of the antenna elements is low or even negligible. It is often said that two antennas are correlated meaning that the channel from the two antennas to any receiver antenna are correlated. This convention is used throughout the present disclosure.

In the 3GPP LTE standard specification TS 36.211, a codebook of 16 matrices is defined which facilitates feedback of dual polarized antenna arrays. Each matrix is thus indexed with a single 4 bit index. The feedback can be per sub-band which is a limited part of the total available bandwidth, or wideband which is the whole available bandwidth, i.e. the sum of all sub-bands. Hence, according to said specification a 4 bit PMI is fed back for each of N number of sub-bands, or for the wideband case. Therefore, 4*N feedback bits is needed when using the method in the TS 36.211 specification.

SUMMARY

An aspect of the present invention is to provide a method for reporting CSI with reduced overhead compared to prior art solutions. Also an aspect of the invention is to provide a method of reporting CSI with improved accuracy.

Example embodiments of the invention provide for channel state information (CSI) reporting by means of a codebook representation comprising a number of one or more matrices arranged according to two or more sub-indices between a transmit node (TN) and a receive node (RN) in a wireless communication system being arranged for providing or processing the sub-indices with index-specific time-frequency reporting granularity as further explained in the subsequent detailed description.

Thereby, CSI reporting overhead may reduce and facilitate increased uplink data throughput. CSI reporting accuracy may also improve and, e.g., result in increased downlink user throughput and increased downlink cell throughput.

Furthermore, required receiver complexity is reduced according to preferred embodiments, wherein the first sub-index is common to all sub-bands, and the selection of the first sub-index need not be repeated for every sub-band. Yet another benefit of an example embodiment of the invention is that the codebook may be structured in a suitable way for taking advantage of and transferring CSI reports according to characteristics of commonly used dual polarized antenna arrays.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:

FIG. 1 is an example of a dual polarized antenna array with six antenna elements V1, V2, V3, H1, H2 and H3, wherein the elements V1, V2 and V3 have the same polarization, which is orthogonal to the polarization of antenna elements H1, H2 and H3;

FIG. 2 is an example where a full bandwidth is divided into four sub-bands, and wherein for each sub-band a preferred precoding matrix is selected and reported. The first sub-index is the same for all sub-bands in this example, but the second sub-index may be different for each sub-band;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart of how a receive node may select a matrix index per sub-band and transmit a CSI report;

FIG. 4 is a flow chart of how a CSI per sub-band may be reconstructed by a transmit node of a CSI report received from a receive node;

FIG. 5 shows an example of the use of wideband CSI feedback reports and per sub-band CSI feedback reports;

FIG. 6 shows an example of transmission between a transmit node (TN) and a receive node (RN) in a wireless communication system;

FIG. 7 shows time-frequency representation of a channel in a multi-carrier communication system, wherein each rectangle represents the time-frequency granularity by frequency bandwidth F and time duration T;

FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of a particular example of a RN, which is a mobile station having a processor and a transceiver for reporting channel state information in a multi-carrier cellular communication system; and

FIG. 9 shows a block diagram of another particular example of a RN, which is a mobile station having processing circuitries for reporting channel state information in a multi-carrier cellular communication system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

In communications relying upon, channel state information, CSI, retrieved in circuitry adapted therefore and reported/fed back from a receive node (RN) to a transmit node (TN) in a wireless communication system as shown in FIG. 6, the transmit node preferably comprises processing circuitry adapted for applying this information about the state of the radio channel to improve the subsequent multiple antenna transmission of data to the receive node.

In a multi-carrier communication system, such as LTE or LTE-A, the underlying channel for a given subcarrier between a transmit node and a receive node is preferably represented by a N_(r) times N_(t) matrix

, where N_(t) is the number of transmit antennas and N_(r) is the number of receive antennas, respectively. The CSI feedback can therefore be a quantization of the N_(r) times N_(t) matrix

using a codebook c of matrices, or

can also be a preferred precoding matrix having size N_(t) times R, where 1≤R≤min(N_(r),N_(t)) is the preferred transmission rank. The transmission rank, also known as the number of layers, determines the degree of spatial multiplexing in a transmission.

Since the radio channel is fading in the frequency and time domain, the selected matrix or equivalently the CSI will only be valid for some frequency bandwidth F and time interval T, which henceforth will be denoted as the time-frequency granularity of a CSI feedback report.

FIG. 7 illustrates time-frequency granularity for a multicarrier communication system, wherein each rectangle represents a frequency bandwidth and a time duration for which the CSI can be considered constant or similar, and therefore one CSI report is required for each of the rectangles in FIG. 7 to accurately describe the CSI for the whole transmission bandwidth during the time interval T.

So, for reporting the CSI for a bandwidth that is K times larger than F a CSI report will consist of K number of CSIs, where each of the CSI reports reflects the channel state in a corresponding frequency bandwidth F and time interval T. A feedback report thus contains K number of matrices W^(i) from a codebook c, where K≥1 and i=0 . . . K−1.

It has further been observed by the inventors that correlated antennas or the channel from a group of correlated antennas have a larger coherence bandwidth of the spatial correlation and longer coherence time compared to antennas, or between antenna groups with lower correlation, and could therefore have a lower granularity in its feedback. Therefore, even though a CSI feedback matrix W^(i) has a time-frequency granularity with frequency bandwidth F and time interval T, it is possible to structure the matrix W^(i) in such way that different sub-parts of this matrix structure has a lower time-frequency granularity, i.e., F′ and/or T′, or equivalently F′>F and/or T′>T. Different structures of a CSI matrix W^(i) are covered by different embodiments of the present invention.

The exploitation of the antenna correlation in a CSI report is achieved by introducing a special structure of the matrices belonging to the codebook c, which allows for indexing the matrices in the codebook c by P number of sub-indices, where P>1. Also, by using multiple sub-indices according to the invention, each one of the sub-indices may have its own time-frequency granularity. This is an effective and low complex way of reducing the total number of bits required to report the CSI and therefore advantage over prior art.

Hence, the present invention relates to a method for reporting CSI between a transmit node and a receive node in a wireless communication system. The transmit node being arranged for multiple transmit antenna transmissions and the CSI being represented by K number of matrices W^(i) from a codebook c comprising a plurality of matrices, wherein each matrix in the codebook c represents a state, or a preferred precoding matrix, for the multi-antenna channel from the transmit node to the receive node, K≥1 and i=0 . . . K−1. The method comprises the steps of: reporting a first sub-index k₁; and reporting at least one additional second sub-index k₂ for each one of the K number of matrices W^(i), wherein each one of the K number of matrices W^(i) is indexed by the first k₁ and second k₂ sub-indices, and the first k₁ and second k₂ sub-indices have different time-frequency reporting granularity.

The invention can therefore be understood as that the first sub-index k₁ indicates a matrix M_(k) ₁ from a first sub-codebook C₁ and that the at least one additional second sub-index k₂ indicates a matrix M_(k) ₂ ^(i) from a second sub-codebook C₂ so that each one of the K number of matrices W^(i) in codebook c are generated from the first M_(k) ₁ and second matrices M_(k) ₂ ^(i), which are indexed by the first k₁ and at least one additional second k₂ sub-index, respectively.

Therefore, the present invention can reduce CSI feedback overhead, or alternatively by keeping the same feedback overhead, it is possible to improve CSI feedback reporting accuracy since each feedback bits will be more efficiently utilized. This is achieved by taking advantage of the correlations of the radio channel, which is the same for common antenna setups in the art, such as a narrow spaced antenna element array with dual polarized antenna elements.

As an example of an implementation of the invention: assume a codebook c with 32 matrices, so 5 bits is required to index a matrix W^(i) belonging to said codebook c. If the matrix W^(i) is indexed by at least two sub-indices k₁,k₂, where a first sub-index k₁ is a three bit index and a second sub-index k₂ is a two bit index. Hence, to represent a matrix, both sub-indices k₁,k₂ are needed and in total 5 bits are used. As mentioned, the different sub-indices k₁ and k₂ are fed back with different granularity in time and/or frequency. This has feedback overhead benefits. For instance, the first sub-index k₁ can be reported every 10 milliseconds whereas the second sub-index k₂ is reported every 1 millisecond. The receiver of the feedback message thus updates the first sub-index k₁ in the index pair k₁,k₂ less frequently than the second sub-index k₂. The overhead benefits of this is arrangement is obvious; instead of feeding back 5 bits per millisecond or 5 kbit/s, the overhead has been reduced to effectively (3+2*10)/10=2.3 bits per millisecond or equivalently 2.3 kbit/s.

The same principle can be applied for reducing overhead when reporting CSI for multiple sub-bands in frequency, where the selection of the first sub-index k₁ can be valid for a bandwidth of 300 subcarriers, and whereas the selection of the second sub-index k₂ is valid for a sub-band bandwidth of 30 subcarriers. Hence, if the total bandwidth is 300 subcarriers, one first sub-index k₁ and ten second sub-indices k₂ must be reported to indicate the matrix W^(i) of each sub-band. The feedback overhead to support per sub-band CSI feedback is thus reduced from 50 bits (if 5 bits is reported for each of the 10 sub-bands) to 23 bits (if 3 bits is used for the first sub-index k₁ and 2 bits for each of the second sub-indices k₂).

The principle can also be used to improve the accuracy of the CSI report, where the selection of the first sub-index k₁ can be valid for a bandwidth of 300 subcarriers, whereas the selection of the second sub-index k₂ is valid for a sub-band bandwidth of 15 subcarriers, which is less than the 30 subcarriers in the previous example. Due to the reduced sub-bandwidth, each CSI report will represent the CSI for a small frequency bandwidth and therefore be better matched to the radio channel, i.e., have better accuracy. Hence, assuming that the total bandwidth includes 300 subcarriers, one first sub-index k₁ and twenty second sub-indices k₂ must be reported to indicate the matrix W^(i) for each sub-band. The feedback overhead to support per sub-band CSI feedback is thus 43 bits (if 3 bits is used for the first sub-index k₁ and 2 bits for each of the second sub-indices k₂).

An alternative way to improve the accuracy of the CSI report is to increase the codebook size. Assuming that the selection of the first sub-index k₁ is valid for a bandwidth of 300 subcarriers, whereas the selection of the second sub-index k₂ is valid for a sub-band bandwidth of 30 subcarriers. Hence, if the total bandwidth is 300 subcarriers, one first sub-index k₁ and ten second sub-indices k₂ must be reported to indicate the matrix W^(i) for each sub-band. The feedback overhead to support per sub-band CSI feedback is again 43 bits but with a larger codebook (if 3 bits is used for the first sub-index k₁ and 4 bits for each of the sub-indices k₂).

A further example of per sub-band CSI feedback is given in FIG. 2 where the full bandwidth is divided into four sub-bands and a matrix from a codebook with P=2 has been used, where P denotes the number of sub-indices used to index each matrix W^(i) in the codebook C. The first sub-index for each matrix W^(i) is common to all sub-bands and needs thus only be reported once, whereas the second sub-index is dependent on the sub-band number.

In FIG. 1, a dual polarized antenna array with six antenna elements is illustrated. Each of the two polarizations creates a linear antenna array with three antenna elements. The antenna elements with the same polarization (e.g., V1 and V2) will have a high correlation (i.e., will generate channels with high correlation) if they are placed with narrow spacing, but the correlation between antenna elements with different correlation (e.g., V1 and H1) will generally have a low or a negligible correlation. This dual polarized antenna array structure is a preferred antenna setup when many antenna elements at the transmitter is desirable due to the compact size obtained by utilizing two polarization antennas. The size of the antenna array can be reduced further by selecting a small separation between antenna elements having the same polarization.

Therefore, according to an embodiment of the invention aforementioned correlation properties of dual polarized antenna arrays is taken advantage of as it is known that closely spaced antennas with the same polarization have high correlation whereas antennas with orthogonal polarizations have low correlation. If a first group of antenna elements are numbered 1 to N_(t)/2 and are arranged so that they have the same polarization and a second group of antenna elements are numbered N_(t)/2+1 to N_(t) have the same but orthogonal polarization with respect to the first group. Then a matrix codebook c with P=2 indices can be structured as:

$\begin{matrix} {{W^{i} = {{\begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}M_{k_{2}}^{i}} \end{bmatrix}\mspace{20mu} {or}\mspace{20mu} W^{i}} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{2}}^{i}M_{k_{1}}} \end{bmatrix}}},} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where the matrices M_(k) ₁ and M_(k) ^(i) are taken from a first and a second sub-codebook c₁ and c₂, indexed by the first and second sub-matrices, respectively. The matrix M_(k) ₁ then reflects the precoding matrix for correlated antenna elements and can then be optimized for this scenario using, e.g., Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) matrices. The matrix M_(k) ₂ ^(i), which may be a diagonal matrix, then reflects the phase and the amplitude relationship between the two polarizations. The matrix W^(i) is thus indexed by two sub-indices k₁,k₂, where the first sub-index k₁ can be reported back with lower granularity in frequency and/or time, since this sub-index corresponds to the correlated subset of antenna elements, whereas the second sub-index k₂ can be reported back with higher granularity in frequency and/or time (e.g., higher sampling rate in frequency and/or time), since the second sub-index corresponds to the relation between the two different polarization directions.

In another embodiment of the invention a matrix W^(i) from the codebook c derived by two matrices from sub-codebooks c₁ and c₂ by equation (1) can also be written as:

$\begin{matrix} {{W^{i} = {\begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}D_{k_{2}}} \end{bmatrix} = {\underset{\underset{A_{k_{1}}}{}}{\begin{pmatrix} M_{k_{1}} & 0 \\ 0 & M_{k_{1}} \end{pmatrix}}\underset{\underset{B_{k_{2}}}{}}{\begin{pmatrix} I \\ D_{k_{2}} \end{pmatrix}}}}},} & (2) \end{matrix}$

where a product of two matrices, each with different indices describes the underlying matrix structure. Hence, in equation (2) different time-frequency granularity is used for reporting the index to the two matrices M_(k) ₁ and M_(k) ₂ ^(i), respectively.

In a yet another embodiment of the invention matrices W^(i) in codebook c with P=2 sub-indices can be structured as:

W^(i)=M_(k) ₂ ^(i)⊗M_(k) ₁ or W^(i)=M_(k) ₁ ⊗M_(k) ₂ ^(i)   (3),

where ⊗ is the Kronecker product and the matrices M_(k) ₁ and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) are obtained from the sub-codebooks c₁ and c₂, respectively. The time-frequency granularity of the reporting of matrix M_(k) ₁ may be higher or lower than for matrix M_(k) ₂ ^(i).

In a yet another embodiment matrices W^(i) in codebook c with P=2 sub-indices can be structured as:

W^(i)=M_(k) ₂ ^(i)M_(k) ₁ or W^(i)=M_(k) ₁ M_(k) ₂ ^(i)   (4),

which is a general structure where one of the matrices is the wideband representation and the other matrix is the feed back per sub-band representation.

In a further embodiment of the invention matrices W^(i) in the codebook c are structured as:

$\begin{matrix} {{W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}e^{j\; d_{k_{2}}}} \end{bmatrix}},} & (5) \end{matrix}$

wherein d_(k) ₂ is a scalar.

In a further embodiment, the number of sub-indices is P=3 and matrices W^(i) in the codebook c are indexed by three sub-indices (k₁, k₂ and k₃, respectively) and can be structured as:

$\begin{matrix} {{W^{i} = {{\begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{2}}^{i}M_{k_{3}}} \end{bmatrix}\mspace{20mu} {or}\mspace{20mu} W^{i}} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{3}}M_{k_{2}}^{i}} \end{bmatrix}}},} & (6) \end{matrix}$

wherein M_(k) ₁ and M_(k) ₃ reflects precoding matrices for correlated antennas so k₁,k₃ are reported back with lower time-frequency granularity than the second sub-index k₂ for the matrix M_(k) ₂ ^(i) which reflects the relationship between the polarizations and is thus feed back with higher granularity in frequency and/or time.

According to the 3GPP LTE and LTE-Advanced standards, there exist two feedback reporting possibilities, i.e. using the Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) and the Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH). The PUCCH is configured to transmit few bits (low payload) periodically, whilst the PUSCH can carry a large number of bits and is a scheduled aperiodic resource. Furthermore, a useful property of CSI feedback is that each report is self-contained meaning that one should not have to rely on multiple reports fed back at different time instants to compute the CSI for a given sub-band. Therefore, the PUCCH is suitable for wideband feedback meaning that the PUCCH contain some average CSI information for the whole feedback bandwidth. The PUSCH on the other hand which has less limitation on the payload, and thus can carry more bits, is better suited for the detailed per sub-band CSI. An example of this feedback structure is shown in FIG. 5. In this figure the height of the bars, at each reporting instant, illustrates the number of bits reported in that CSI report. The PUCCH report is periodic, whereas the PUSCH report may be aperiodic meaning that the transmitting node requests a PUSCH report when needed. It is however also possible to configure a periodic PUSCH report with some other periodicity than the PUCCH report, which is well understood by the skilled person in the art.

The use of the PUCCH for wideband feedback can be supported by the present invention by feeding back the P number of sub-indices and where there is only one sub-band spanning the whole bandwidth reflecting a wideband CSI in the PUCCH. Furthermore, overhead can be reduced further by introducing some relationship among the P indices. This can be explained by an example. Assume the matrix structure:

$\begin{matrix} {{W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}e^{j\; d_{k_{2}}}} \end{bmatrix}},} & (7) \end{matrix}$

where the first sub-codebook C₁ for the matrix M_(k) ₁ is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{C_{1} = \left\{ {\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ {- 1} \end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ i \end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ {- i} \end{bmatrix}} \right\}},} & (8) \end{matrix}$

where i=√{square root over (−1)}, and the second sub-codebook C₂ contains scalars d_(k) ₂ given by:

C ₂={π−π}  (9).

Hence, the first sub-index k₁ is in this example represented by two bits whereas the second sub-index k₂is represented by one bit only. Assuming that there are 10 sub-bands in a per sub-band feedback suitable for the PUSCH, then 2+10*1=12 bits are reported back. In a wideband feedback suitable for the PUCCH, 2+1=3 bits are fed back.

As mentioned above, it is possible to further reduce the feedback overhead to two bits by introducing dependencies between the P number of sub-indices. In a feedback container, in which the payload is very limited, it is possible to make a table of “allowed” pairs of P sub-indices. An example of this is shown in Table 1 below. Although the full codebook contains 8 elements and requires three bits, this has been reduced to two bits in the example in Table 1. To select which matrices that should be included in the table, it is possible to resort to different optimization methods, and for instance aim at maximizing the minimum Chordal distance between the remaining matrices.

TABLE 1 Example on how to reduce feedback overhead by introducing dependencies between codebook indices k₁ k₂ $W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}e^{j\; d_{k_{2}}}} \end{bmatrix}$ 0 0 $W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}$ 1 1 $W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ {- 1} \\ {- 1} \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}$ 2 0 $W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ i \\ 1 \\ i \end{bmatrix}$ 3 1 $W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ {- i} \\ {- 1} \\ i \end{bmatrix}$

It should also be noted that the matrices W^(i) in the codebook c may used as PMIs, which is obvious to the skilled person.

Furthermore, the invention also relates to a method in a receive node, a method in a transmit node and devices thereof.

One embodiment method can be used in a transmit node for receiving and processing CSI between the transmit node and a receive node, where the CSI being represented by K number of matrices W^(i) from a codebook c comprises a plurality of matrices. The method includes receiving a first sub-index k₁ and receiving at least one additional second sub-index k₂ for each one of the K number of matrices W^(i). Each one of the K number of matrices W^(i) which are indexed by said first k₁ and second k₂ sub-indices are reconstructed. The first k₁ and second k₂ sub-indices have different time-frequency reporting granularity. A transmit node device thereof is also disclosed in the present application.

Another embodiment method can be used in a receive node for reporting CSI between a transmit node and the receive node. The CSI being represented by K number of matrices W^(i) from a codebook c comprises a plurality of matrices. In the embodiment method, the receive node reports a first sub-index k₁ and at least one additional second sub-index k₂ for each one of the K number of matrices W^(i). Each one of the K number of matrices W^(i) is indexed by the first k₁ and second k₂ sub-indices, and the first k₁ and second k₂ sub-indices have different time-frequency reporting granularity. A receive node device thereof is also disclosed in the present application.

It is also understood by the skilled person that the method in a transmit node and the method in a receive node may be modified, mutatis mutandis, according to the different embodiments of the method in a wireless communication system according to the present invention.

Moreover, an example flowchart of how a receive node, which reports the CSI to a transmit node, selects the matrix per each of the K number of sub-bands (i.e. sub-indices k₁,k₂ per sub-band in this particular example) and report back this information is given in FIG. 3.

Block 301: Computing k₁ as common for all sub-bands;

Block 303: Computing k₂ individually for each sub-band, conditioned on selected k₁;

Block 305: Reporting (transmitting) one k₁ and at least one k₂ per sub-band, effectively one k₁,k₂ index pair per sub-band, wherein k₁ and k₂ have different time-frequency reporting granularity.

In FIG. 4, an example flowchart is given of how a transmit node reconstructs the CSI for each of the K number of sub-bands.

Block 401: Receiving one k₁ and at least one additional k₂;

Block 403: For each sub-band: generating the index pair k₁,k₂ using the first sub-index k₁ and sub-band dependent second sub-index k₂;

Block 405: Use the index pair k₁,k₂ for each of K sub-bands to find the corresponding matrix W^(i) , i=0 . . . K−1 in the codebook C by using first and second sub-codebooks.

In FIG. 4, The transmit node has received one first sub-index k₁ and K number of second sub-indices k₂ (one for each sub-band) and uses the sub-indices and the first and second sub-codebooks C₁ and C₂ for reconstructing the matrix W^(i) for the i:th sub-band. The matrix W^(i) hence represents the CSI for sub-band i and is a matrix in the codebook C.

Furthermore, as understood by the person skilled in the art, the method in a receive node and the method in a transmit node according to the present invention may be implemented in a computer program, having code means, which when run in a computer causes the computer to execute the steps of the method. As particular examples, FIG. 8 illustrates a RN which is a mobile station having a transceiver and a processor for reporting channel state information, and FIG. 9 illustrates a RN which is a mobile station having processing circuitries in an apparatus for reporting channel state information. The computer program is included in a computer readable medium of a computer program product. The computer readable medium may consist of essentially any memory, such as a ROM (Read-Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read-Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable PROM), a Flash memory, an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable PROM), or a hard disk drive.

It should finally be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but also relates to and incorporates all embodiments within the scope of the appended independent claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus, comprising: a storage medium including executable instructions; and a processor that executes the instructions to communicate with a base station in a multi-carrier cellular communication system having a plurality of sub-carriers, determine a matrix for the plurality of sub-carriers, determine a first sub-index from a plurality of the first sub-indices and a second sub-index for the matrix from a plurality of the second sub-indices, and report the first sub-index and the second sub-index on a periodic physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), wherein the first sub-index and the second sub-index are common for the plurality of sub-carriers and the precoding matrix indicator (PMI) of the plurality of sub-carriers represents the matrix.
 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the matrix comprises a first sub-matrix and a second sub-matrix, the first sub-index indicates the first sub-matrix from a first sub-codebook; and the second sub-index indicates the second sub-matrix from a second sub-codebook.
 3. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}M_{k_{2}}^{i}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k2 represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 4. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{2}}^{i}M_{k_{1}}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 5. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: W^(i)=M_(k) ₂ ^(i)M_(k) ₁ or W^(i)=M_(k) ₁ M_(k) ₂ ^(i), where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 6. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}e^{i\; d_{k_{2}}}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents a matrix, and d_(k) ₂ represents a scalar.
 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the multi-carrier cellular communication system is selected from at least one of a long term evolution (LTE) system or a long term evolution advanced (LTE-A) system.
 8. A method, comprising: determining a matrix for a plurality of sub-carriers in a multi-carrier cellular communication system; determining a first sub-index from a plurality of the first sub-indices and a second sub-index for the matrix from a plurality of the second sub-indices; and reporting the first sub-index and the second sub-index on a periodic physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), wherein the first sub-index and the second sub-index are common for the plurality of sub-carriers.
 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the matrix comprises a first sub-matrix and a second sub-matrix, the first sub-index indicates the first sub-matrix from a first sub-codebook; and the second sub-index indicates the second sub-matrix from a second sub-codebook.
 10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}M_{k_{2}}^{i}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{2}}^{i}M_{k_{1}}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 12. The method according to claim 9, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: W^(i)=M_(k) ₂ ^(i)M_(k) ₁ or W^(i)=M_(k) ₁ M_(k) ₂ ^(i), where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 13. The method according to claim 9, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}e^{j\; d_{k_{2}}}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents a matrix, and d_(k) ₂ represents a scalar.
 14. The method according to claim 8, wherein the multi-carrier cellular communication system is a long term evolution (LTE) system or a long term evolution advanced (LTE-A) system.
 15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to: determine a matrix for the plurality of sub-carriers in a multi-carrier cellular communication system; determine a first sub-index from a plurality of first sub-indices and a second sub-index for the matrix from a plurality of second sub-indices; and report the first sub-index and the second sub-index on a periodic physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), wherein the first sub-index and the second sub-index are common for the plurality of sub-carriers.
 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15, wherein the matrix comprises a first sub-matrix and a second sub-matrix, the first sub-index indicates the first sub-matrix from a first sub-codebook; and the second sub-index indicates the second sub-matrix from a second sub-codebook.
 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 16, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}M_{k_{2}}^{i}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 17, wherein the matrix is represented as W¹, where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{2}}^{i}M_{k_{1}}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 17, wherein the matrix is represented as W¹, where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: W^(i)=M_(k) ₂ ^(i)M_(k) ₁ or W^(i)=M_(k) ₁ M_(k) ₂ ^(i), where W^(i) represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents the first sub-matrix, and M_(k) ₂ ^(i) represents the second sub-matrix.
 20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 17, wherein the matrix is represented as W^(i), where 0≤i≤K−1; and W^(i), the first sub-matrix, and the second sub-matrix are related as: ${W^{i} = \begin{bmatrix} M_{k_{1}} \\ {M_{k_{1}}e^{j\; d_{k_{2}}}} \end{bmatrix}},$ where W¹ represents the i^(th) matrix, k₁ represents the first sub-index, k₂ represents the second sub-index, M_(k) ₁ represents a matrix, and d_(k) ₂ represents a scalar. 